Paul Keys

36 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Paul Keys
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Management Science and Operations Research 282
  • Public Administration 42
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 64
  • Artificial Intelligence 129
  • Management Information Systems 35
Replace Charles B. Finn with:
Charles B. Finn United States
Ion Georgiou Brazil
Jan Achterbergh Netherlands
Euel W. Elliott United States
Dave Snowden United States
Mikael Cäker Sweden
Johannes Ulrich Siebert Germany
Einar Thorsrud Tanzania
Jean Boulton United Kingdom
Martín Schaffernicht Chile
Paul Keys relative to Charles B. Finn United States Charles B. Finn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Charles B. Finn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Keys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Keys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Keys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Keys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Keys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Keys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Keys. The network helps show where Paul Keys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Paul Keys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Keys Line = papers co-authored together Paul Keys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
New directions in management science
1987121
2 198845
3
New Management in Human Services
198840
4 198924
5
Understanding the process of operational research : collected readings
199517
6 199116
7 199015
8 199114
9 199113
10 200713
11 200712
12 199111
13 20079
14 19939
15 19879
16 19888
17 19807
18 20006
19 19913
20 19983

About Paul Keys

Paul Keys is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Strategy and Management and Public Administration, having authored 38 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (16 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (5 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (4 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (2 papers), Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis (1 paper) and Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (282 citations), Public Administration (42 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (64 citations), Artificial Intelligence (129 citations) and Management Information Systems (35 citations). Paul Keys has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Jackson, León Ginsberg, Robert L. Flood, Alex Norman, Nigel Thrift, John R. Beaumont and Ken Bowen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Operational Research Society, Administration in Social Work, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Applied Mathematical Modelling and Journal of Employment Counseling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact