Paul Byron

43 papers receiving 924 citations

Peers

Paul Byron
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Gender Studies 564
  • Clinical Psychology 528
  • Communication 153
  • Sociology and Political Science 503
  • Social Psychology 170
Replace Elise Carrotte with:
Elise Carrotte Australia
Andrea Waling Australia
Jeanne R. Steele United States
Carol J. Pardun United States
Rachel M. Schmitz United States
Laina Y. Bay‐Cheng United States
Sven‐Axel Månsson Sweden
Ashley Kraus United States
Adam M. Galovan United States
Sarah Pedersen United Kingdom
Paul Byron relative to Elise Carrotte Australia Elise Carrotte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elise Carrotte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Byron

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Byron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Byron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Byron more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Byron

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Byron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Byron. The network helps show where Paul Byron may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Byron, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Byron Line = papers co-authored together Paul Byron links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019101
2 2016101
3 201394
4 202084
5 201965
6
Young people and sexting in Australia: Ethics, representation and the law
201346
7 202037
8 202031
9
"Hey, i'm having these experiences": Tumblr use and young people's queer (dis)connections
201930
10 201530
11 201927
12 202026
13 201426
14 201723
15 201623
16 202022
17 201920
18 201919
19 200718
20 202118

About Paul Byron

Paul Byron is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 46 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (32 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (22 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (9 papers), Sex work and related issues (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers) and Digital Games and Media (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (564 citations), Clinical Psychology (528 citations), Communication (153 citations), Sociology and Political Science (503 citations) and Social Psychology (170 citations). Paul Byron has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kath Albury, Katerina Litsou, Alan McKee, Roger Ingham, Brady Robards, Brendan Churchill, Benjamin Hanckel, Clifton Evers, Sonja Vivienne and Kate Crawford. Their work appears in journals such as Culture Health & Sexuality, Porn Studies, International journal of communication, Media International Australia and Sex Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact