Porn Studies

375 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 375 papers published in Porn Studies in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Porn Studies usually cover Clinical Psychology (313 papers), Gender Studies (267 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (189 papers) specifically the topics of Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (313 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (257 papers) and Sex work and related issues (122 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Porn Studies are Rachael Liberman, Kath Albury, Heather Berg, Alan McKee, Susanna Paasonen, Clarissa Smith, Feona Attwood, Katrin Tiidenberg, Emily van der Nagel and Martin Barker.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Porn Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Porn Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Porn Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Porn Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Porn Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Porn Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Porn Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025