Ash Watson
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
-
- Artistic and Creative Research
Papers in
-
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism 9
-
- Artistic and Creative Research 8
- Co-authors
- Deborah A. Lupton (17 shared papers)Mike Michael (3 shared papers)Andy Bennett (2 shared papers)Clare Southerton (5 shared papers)Marianne Clark (5 shared papers)Paul Byron (2 shared papers)Alan McKee (2 shared papers)Katerina Litsou (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Qualitative Research (4 papers)The Sociological Review (3 papers)Visual Studies (2 papers)Sociological Research Online (2 papers)Sociology of Health & Illness (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Ash Watson
34 papers receiving 498 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Cultural Studies 63
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 52
- Human-Computer Interaction 31
- Sociology and Political Science 202
- Communication 33
Countries citing papers authored by Ash Watson
This map shows the geographic impact of Ash Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ash Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ash Watson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ash Watson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ash Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ash Watson. The network helps show where Ash Watson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ash Watson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 95 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 3 |
About Ash Watson
Ash Watson is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Conservation, having authored 41 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (9 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (8 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (7 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (4 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (3 papers), Gender and Feminist Studies (3 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (3 papers) and Music History and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (63 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (52 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations), Sociology and Political Science (202 citations) and Communication (33 citations). Ash Watson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Deborah A. Lupton, Mike Michael, Andy Bennett, Clare Southerton, Marianne Clark, Paul Byron, Alan McKee, Katerina Litsou, Roger Ingham and Emma R. Kirby. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Research, The Sociological Review, Visual Studies, Sociological Research Online and Sociology of Health & Illness.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.