Paul Bachner
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Blood transfusion and management
- Family Practice top 10%
Papers in
-
- Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control 9
-
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 2
- Health Sciences Research and Education 2
- Co-authors
- Peter J. Howanitz (10 shared papers)Stephen W. Renner (2 shared papers)Richard J. Zarbo (1 shared paper)Ron B. Schifman (2 shared papers)William B. Hamlin (2 shared papers)Enrique C. Gadow (1 shared paper)John T. Queenan (1 shared paper)George S. Cembrowski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (2 papers)American Journal of Clinical Pathology (1 paper)Clinical Chemistry (1 paper)Pure and Applied Chemistry (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Paul Bachner
26 papers receiving 511 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Biochemistry 98
- Family Practice 21
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 34
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 57
- Medical Laboratory Technology 11
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Bachner
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Bachner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Bachner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Bachner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Bachner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Bachner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Bachner. The network helps show where Paul Bachner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Paul Bachner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Preoperative autologous blood donation in 612 hospitals. A College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes study of quality issues in transfusion practice. | 1992 | 90 |
| 2 | Wristband identification error reporting in 712 hospitals. A College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes study of quality issues in transfusion practice. | 1993 | 89 |
| 3 | Interinstitutional comparison of performance in breast fine-needle aspiration cytology. A Q-probe quality indicator study. | 1991 | 58 |
| 4 | 1970 | 40 | |
| 5 | Blood culture quality improvement: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study involving 909 institutions and 289 572 blood culture sets. | 1996 | 37 |
| 6 | Transfusion medicine monitoring practices. A study of the College of American Pathologists/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Outcomes Working Group. | 1995 | 30 |
| 7 | Laboratory phlebotomy. College of American Pathologists Q-Probe study of patient satisfaction and complications in 23,783 patients. | 1991 | 29 |
| 8 | Indications and immediate patient outcomes of pathology intraoperative consultations. College of American Pathologists/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Outcomes Working Group Study. | 1996 | 27 |
| 9 | 1964 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 22 | |
| 11 | Quantification of errors in laboratory reports. A quality improvement study of the College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes program. | 1992 | 17 |
| 12 | Bedside glucose monitoring. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of the program characteristics and performance in 605 institutions. | 1993 | 15 |
| 13 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1965 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 18 | Alternate site testing. The old and new paradigm or the past is prologue. | 1995 | 7 |
| 19 | The epidemiology of fear. Scientific, social, and political responses to the occupational risk of blood-borne infection. | 1990 | 6 |
| 20 | 1996 | 4 |
About Paul Bachner
Paul Bachner is a scholar working on Physiology, General Health Professions, Medical Laboratory Technology, Molecular Biology and Health Information Management, having authored 28 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (9 papers), Quality and Safety in Healthcare (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Blood donation and transfusion practices (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (98 citations), Family Practice (21 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (34 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (57 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (11 citations). Paul Bachner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Howanitz, Stephen W. Renner, Richard J. Zarbo, Ron B. Schifman, William B. Hamlin, Enrique C. Gadow, John T. Queenan, George S. Cembrowski, Donald G. McKay and D. Rittenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Clinical Chemistry, Pure and Applied Chemistry and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.