Patrick Tucker
Impact in
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Papers in
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 12
-
- Social Media and Politics 6
- Co-authors
- Steven S. Smith (6 shared papers)Betsy Sinclair (4 shared papers)Jon C. Rogowski (3 shared papers)Christopher Claassen (2 shared papers)Michelle Torres (3 shared papers)Michael J. Nelson (1 shared paper)Jonathan Homola (2 shared papers)Jacob Montgomery (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Political Behavior (2 papers)Political Science Research and Methods (2 papers)Electoral Studies (2 papers)American Politics Research (2 papers)Political Research Quarterly (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Patrick Tucker
13 papers receiving 204 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Communication 58
- Political Science and International Relations 149
- Sociology and Political Science 117
- Law 25
- Gender Studies 17
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Tucker
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Tucker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Tucker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Tucker. The network helps show where Patrick Tucker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Tucker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 51 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 13 | Ideological Labels in America: Self-Identification of Ideological Positions on Issues and the Operational-Symbolic Ideology Problem | 2013 | 1 |
| 14 | 2017 | 0 |
About Patrick Tucker
Patrick Tucker is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (12 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (5 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers), Media Influence and Politics (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (58 citations), Political Science and International Relations (149 citations), Sociology and Political Science (117 citations), Law (25 citations) and Gender Studies (17 citations). Patrick Tucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven S. Smith, Betsy Sinclair, Jon C. Rogowski, Christopher Claassen, Michelle Torres, Michael J. Nelson, Jonathan Homola, Jacob Montgomery, Steven W. Webster and Richard T. Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Political Behavior, Political Science Research and Methods, Electoral Studies, American Politics Research and Political Research Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.