Mark E. Correia

588 citations
10 papers · 469 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Mark E. Correia

10 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Mark E. Correia
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Health 146
  • Political Science and International Relations 400
  • Sociology and Political Science 431
  • Gender Studies 80
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 22
Replace Jennifer Calnon Cherkauskas with:
Jennifer Calnon Cherkauskas United States
Brian L. Withrow United States
Venessa Garcia United States
Jayne Sykes United Kingdom
Simon Megicks United Kingdom
Michelle D. Bonner Canada
Mathew D. Lynch United States
Jeffrey S. Nowacki United States
Julie Barkworth Australia
Bocar Ba United States
Mark E. Correia relative to Jennifer Calnon Cherkauskas United States Jennifer Calnon Cherkauskas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Jennifer Calnon Cherkauskas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Correia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Correia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Correia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Correia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Correia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Correia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Correia. The network helps show where Mark E. Correia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Correia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Correia Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Correia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1996167
2 2010122
3 1997113
4 200024
5 199712
6 201412
7 20107
8 19996
9
Policing communities : understanding crime and solving problems : an anthology
20005
10
Public Attitudes Toward the Washington State Patrol: Results of the 1993 Survey
19941

About Mark E. Correia

Mark E. Correia is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Health, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (7 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (5 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (1 paper), Community Health and Development (1 paper), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (1 paper) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (146 citations), Political Science and International Relations (400 citations), Sociology and Political Science (431 citations), Gender Studies (80 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (22 citations). Mark E. Correia has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Reisig and Nicholas P. Lovrich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Criminal Justice, Policing An International Journal, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Police Practice and Research and Police Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact