Patrick Sleiman

16 papers receiving 749 citations

Peers

Patrick Sleiman
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 282
  • Biological Psychiatry 26
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 107
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 122
Replace Maolin Hu with:
Maolin Hu China
Eugenia Radulescu United States
Zhijiang Wang China
Daniel Bittner Germany
Saroja Bangaru United States
Martina Wengenroth Germany
Deborah A. Nertney Australia
Patrick Sleiman relative to Maolin Hu China Maolin Hu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Maolin Hu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Sleiman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Sleiman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Sleiman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Sleiman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Sleiman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Sleiman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Sleiman. The network helps show where Patrick Sleiman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Sleiman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick Sleiman Line = papers co-authored together Patrick Sleiman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2013346
2 2014170
3 201454
4 201849
5 201848
6 202222
7 202117
8 199914
9 202111
10 20229
11 20227
12 20225
13 20215
14 19991
15 20121
16 20151
17
Dde I RFLP may falsify linkage analysis of hereditary retinoblastoma when using SSCP of p88PR0.6 region.
20010

About Patrick Sleiman

Patrick Sleiman is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Oncology and Genetics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 760 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (3 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), interferon and immune responses (2 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (282 citations), Biological Psychiatry (26 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (107 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (122 citations). Patrick Sleiman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Iceland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Håkon Håkonarson, Raquel E. Gur, Frank Mentch, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Ruben C. Gur, Monica E. Calkins, Kosha Ruparel, Mark A. Elliott, Ragini Verma and Ryan Hopson. Their work appears in journals such as Prenatal Diagnosis, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Molecular Immunology, Molecular Psychiatry and Translational Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact