Patrick Burns

30 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Patrick Burns
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • General Decision Sciences 112
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 206
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 126
  • Applied Psychology 44
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 161
Replace Andrew J. Latham with:
Andrew J. Latham Australia
Mareike B. Wieth United States
John Clibbens United Kingdom
Marcus Lindskog Sweden
Shari Liu United States
Eva Rafetseder United Kingdom
Noriko Coburn United States
Núria Carriedo Spain
Ravit Nussinson Israel
Harry W. Hoemann United States
Patrick Burns relative to Andrew J. Latham Australia Andrew J. Latham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Andrew J. Latham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Burns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Burns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Burns. The network helps show where Patrick Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Burns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick Burns Line = papers co-authored together Patrick Burns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200158
2 201142
3 202032
4 200924
5 201324
6 201823
7 201223
8 202121
9 201120
10 200919
11 202018
12 201918
13 201817
14 201116
15 201415
16 202112
17 201912
18 201911
19 20119
20 20218

About Patrick Burns

Patrick Burns is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 30 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (11 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (112 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (206 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (126 citations), Applied Psychology (44 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations). Patrick Burns has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Teresa McCormack, Sarah R. Beck, Kevin J. Riggs, Patrick A. O’Connor, Christoph Hoerl, Cristina M. Atance, Christopher Lueg, Eugene M. Caruso, Shlomo Berkovsky and Agnieszka Jaroslawska. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Science, Developmental Psychology, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Multimedia Systems and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact