Patrick Bremer
Impact in
-
- Health disparities and outcomes
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Global Health Care Issues
Papers in
-
- Health and Medical Studies 2
- Social and Demographic Issues in Germany 1
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 1
-
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 2
- Co-authors
- Helena Leino‐Kilpi (2 shared papers)Kai Saks (2 shared papers)Sandra Zwakhalen (2 shared papers)Ansgar Wübker (3 shared papers)Esther Cabrera (1 shared paper)María Soto (1 shared paper)Connie Lethin (1 shared paper)Caroline Sutcliffe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Health Policy (2 papers)Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie (1 paper)Health Economics Review (1 paper)Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomFinland
In The Last Decade
Patrick Bremer
5 papers receiving 198 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Health 43
- General Health Professions 128
- Psychiatry and Mental health 65
- Demography 34
- Sociology and Political Science 101
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Bremer
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Bremer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Bremer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Bremer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Bremer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Bremer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Bremer. The network helps show where Patrick Bremer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Bremer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 1 |
About Patrick Bremer
Patrick Bremer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers), Health and Medical Studies (2 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (43 citations), General Health Professions (128 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (65 citations), Demography (34 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (101 citations). Patrick Bremer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Helena Leino‐Kilpi, Kai Saks, Sandra Zwakhalen, Ansgar Wübker, Esther Cabrera, María Soto, Connie Lethin, Caroline Sutcliffe, Bruno Vellas and Ingalill Rahm Hallberg. Their work appears in journals such as Health Policy, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, Health Economics Review and Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.