Patrick Bremer
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
-
- Health disparities and outcomes
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 2
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 1
- Health and Medical Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Kai Saks (2 shared papers)Sandra M.G. Zwakhalen (2 shared papers)Helena Leino‐Kilpi (2 shared papers)Ansgar Wübker (3 shared papers)Connie Lethin (1 shared paper)María Eugenia Osorio Soto (1 shared paper)Esther Cabrera (1 shared paper)Caroline Sutcliffe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (3 papers)Health Policy (2 papers)Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie (1 paper)Health Economics Review (1 paper)Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomEstonia
In The Last Decade
Patrick Bremer
8 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Psychiatry and Mental health 88
- Health 30
- General Health Professions 89
- Demography 26
- Sociology and Political Science 89
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Bremer
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Bremer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Bremer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Bremer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Bremer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Bremer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Bremer. The network helps show where Patrick Bremer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Bremer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 104 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 1 |
About Patrick Bremer
Patrick Bremer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Insect Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (1 paper) and Health and Medical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (88 citations), Health (30 citations), General Health Professions (89 citations), Demography (26 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (89 citations). Patrick Bremer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Kai Saks, Sandra M.G. Zwakhalen, Helena Leino‐Kilpi, Ansgar Wübker, Connie Lethin, María Eugenia Osorio Soto, Esther Cabrera, Caroline Sutcliffe, Dirk Sauerland and David Challis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Health Policy, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, Health Economics Review and Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.