Patrick Archdeacon

24 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Patrick Archdeacon
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Transplantation 224
  • Nephrology 150
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 207
  • Statistics and Probability 67
  • Molecular Biology 514
Replace Shashi Amur with:
Shashi Amur United States
Ann M. Moyer United States
William J. Jusko United States
Huang Sm United States
Debora Williams‐Herman United States
Nidal Al‐Huniti United States
Annick Rousseau France
Gregory T. Golm United States
MO Karlsson Sweden
Jonathan D. Mosley United States
Patrick Archdeacon relative to Shashi Amur United States Shashi Amur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Shashi Amur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Archdeacon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Archdeacon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Archdeacon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Archdeacon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Archdeacon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Archdeacon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Archdeacon. The network helps show where Patrick Archdeacon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Archdeacon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick Archdeacon Line = papers co-authored together Patrick Archdeacon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994391
2 2011142
3 1994138
4 2013111
5 201291
6 201550
7 201342
8 201739
9 201439
10 201729
11 201429
12 201627
13 201626
14 201424
15 201623
16 201616
17 201814
18 201313
19 200813
20 20139

About Patrick Archdeacon

Patrick Archdeacon is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nephrology, Transplantation, Economics and Econometrics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (4 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (224 citations), Nephrology (150 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (207 citations), Statistics and Probability (67 citations) and Molecular Biology (514 citations). Patrick Archdeacon has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christine Kaufmann, Myles H. Akabas, Arthur Karlin, Renata Albrecht, Jacob L. Meyer, Tiffany Cook, Carolyn Y. Neuland, M Cavaillé‐Coll, S Bala and Ergun Velidedeoğlu. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Trials, American Journal of Transplantation, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact