Pak Sham
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
Papers in
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 4
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 2
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 2
- Co-authors
- Robin Murray (10 shared papers)John Powell (3 shared papers)Christopher E. Shaw (2 shared papers)Simon Lovestone (3 shared papers)Ammar Al‐Chalabi (2 shared papers)Marjan Bakker (2 shared papers)P. Nigel Leigh (2 shared papers)Nicola Archer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Schizophrenia Research (5 papers)Psychological Medicine (3 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (2 papers)American Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Pak Sham
17 papers receiving 939 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Psychiatry and Mental health 355
- Biological Psychiatry 41
- Neurology 166
- Physiology 273
- Neurology 75
Countries citing papers authored by Pak Sham
This map shows the geographic impact of Pak Sham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pak Sham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pak Sham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pak Sham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pak Sham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pak Sham. The network helps show where Pak Sham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pak Sham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 370 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 146 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 91 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 78 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 74 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 51 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 48 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 45 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 29 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 1 |
About Pak Sham
Pak Sham is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 992 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (355 citations), Biological Psychiatry (41 citations), Neurology (166 citations), Physiology (273 citations) and Neurology (75 citations). Pak Sham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Robin Murray, John Powell, Christopher E. Shaw, Simon Lovestone, Ammar Al‐Chalabi, Marjan Bakker, P. Nigel Leigh, Nicola Archer, Michaela Poppe and Malcolm Ward. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Psychological Medicine, The British Journal of Psychiatry, American Journal of Psychiatry and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.