P. Verwer

2.2k citations
30 papers · 1.3k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

P. Verwer

30 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

P. Verwer
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 613
  • Materials Chemistry 771
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 186
  • Spectroscopy 180
  • Inorganic Chemistry 125
Replace James F. McCabe with:
James F. McCabe United Kingdom
Detlef W. M. Hofmann Germany
Frank J. J. Leusen United Kingdom
Marc‐Antoine Perrin France
Jacek Korchowiec Poland
Pierre Mignon France
Terry L. Threlfall United Kingdom
Anna Kaczmarek‐Kędziera Poland
Vivekanand V. Gobre India
François Maurel France
P. Verwer relative to James F. McCabe United Kingdom James F. McCabe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
James F. McCabe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Verwer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Verwer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Verwer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Verwer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Verwer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Verwer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Verwer. The network helps show where P. Verwer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Verwer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Verwer Line = papers co-authored together P. Verwer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000335
2 2002301
3 2004116
4 200387
5 199868
6 200353
7 199952
8 200445
9 200537
10 200733
11 200521
12 201220
13 200813
14 199911
15 20049
16 20078
17 20028
18 20048
19 20028
20 20016

About P. Verwer

P. Verwer is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Atmospheric Science and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallization and Solubility Studies (13 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (8 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (5 papers), X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (5 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers) and Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (613 citations), Materials Chemistry (771 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (186 citations), Spectroscopy (180 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (125 citations). P. Verwer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bouke P. van Eijck, Sarah L. Price, Wijnand T. M. Mooij, Elias Vlieg, Frank J. J. Leusen, Jack D. Dunitz, Herman L. Ammon, Hugo Meekes, Detlef W. M. Hofmann and W.D.S. Motherwell. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science, Crystal Growth & Design, Journal of Computational Chemistry, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact