P. Verwer

2.2k citations
31 papers · 1.4k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

P. Verwer

31 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

P. Verwer
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 648
  • Materials Chemistry 816
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 207
  • Spectroscopy 196
  • Inorganic Chemistry 126
Replace Paul Tinnemans with:
Paul Tinnemans Netherlands
Detlef W. M. Hofmann Germany
James F. McCabe United Kingdom
T. C. Dinadayalane United States
Geoffrey P. F. Wood United States
Frank J. J. Leusen United Kingdom
Jacek Korchowiec Poland
François Maurel France
R. Docherty United Kingdom
Anna Kaczmarek‐Kędziera Poland
P. Verwer relative to Paul Tinnemans Netherlands Paul Tinnemans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Paul Tinnemans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Verwer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Verwer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Verwer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Verwer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Verwer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Verwer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Verwer. The network helps show where P. Verwer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Verwer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Verwer Line = papers co-authored together P. Verwer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000355
2 2002318
3 2004122
4 200390
5 199875
6 199956
7 200355
8 200449
9 200537
10 200733
11 200521
12 201221
13 199913
14 200813
15 200411
16 20049
17 20078
18 20028
19 20028
20 19998

About P. Verwer

P. Verwer is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Atmospheric Science and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallization and Solubility Studies (14 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (9 papers), X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (5 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (5 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (5 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (648 citations), Materials Chemistry (816 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (207 citations), Spectroscopy (196 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (126 citations). P. Verwer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bouke P. van Eijck, Wijnand T. M. Mooij, Sarah L. Price, Elias Vlieg, Frank J. J. Leusen, Donald E. Williams, W.D.S. Motherwell, Hugo Meekes, Detlef W. M. Hofmann and A. Gavezzotti. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science, Crystal Growth & Design, Journal of Computational Chemistry, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact