P Speiser

152 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

P Speiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Reproductive Medicine 432
  • Cancer Research 649
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 317
  • Oncology 777
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
Replace US Khoo with:
US Khoo Hong Kong
Tang‐Yuan Chu Taiwan
Thomas Bauknecht Germany
Hung‐Cheng Lai Taiwan
Kian Behbakht United States
Kristina W. Thiel United States
Eliana Bignotti Italy
A. Schauer Germany
Barry M. Kacinski United States
Alan Lamont United Kingdom
P Speiser relative to US Khoo Hong Kong US Khoo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
US Khoo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P Speiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P Speiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P Speiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P Speiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P Speiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P Speiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P Speiser. The network helps show where P Speiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P Speiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P Speiser Line = papers co-authored together P Speiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 164 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Mapping of DNA amplifications at 15 chromosomal localizations in 1875 breast tumors: definition of phenotypic groups.
1997196
2 1995166
3 1996160
4 1997133
5 201299
6 199892
7 199486
8 201581
9 201968
10 199663
11 201261
12 199958
13 201252
14 199450
15 201350
16 198845
17
Prognostic value of tumour microvessel density in cancer of the uterine cervix stage IB to IIB.
199545
18 199744
19 201342
20 200941

About P Speiser

P Speiser is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Hematology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 164 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood groups and transfusion (20 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (19 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (17 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (11 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (9 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (8 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (432 citations), Cancer Research (649 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (317 citations), Oncology (777 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.1k citations). P Speiser has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Zeillinger, Charles Theillet, Christian Schneeberger, Frank Courjal, Alexander Reinthaller, Andreas Obermair, Sepp Leodolter, Jalid Sehouli, Dan Cacsire Castillo‐Tong and Alexandra Kaider. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Cancer, British Journal of Cancer and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact