C Natter

532 citations
14 papers · 422 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 6
    • Hepatitis B Virus Studies 2
    • Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms 2
    • Cancer Risks and Factors 2

C Natter

14 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers

C Natter
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 115
  • Epidemiology 227
  • Reproductive Medicine 44
  • Microbiology 28
  • Oncology 93
Replace J Rahhal with:
J Rahhal Austria
I. D. Duncan United Kingdom
Sari Nakao Japan
Arnold‐Jan Kruse Netherlands
Suchanan Hanamornroongruang Thailand
Marcus J. Trunk Germany
Ho Sun Choi South Korea
Nobutaka Tasaka Japan
Tyler O. Kirby United States
Chang‐Yao Hsieh Taiwan
C Natter relative to J Rahhal Austria J Rahhal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
J Rahhal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C Natter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C Natter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Natter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Natter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C Natter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Natter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Natter. The network helps show where C Natter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C Natter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C Natter Line = papers co-authored together C Natter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201295
2 201275
3 201261
4 201131
5 201330
6 201428
7 201427
8 201320
9
Two multidrug-resistance (ABCB1) gene polymorphisms as prognostic parameters in women with ovarian cancer.
201014
10 201313
11 201510
12 201110
13 20156
14 20112

About C Natter

C Natter is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Oncology, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (2 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers), Genital Health and Disease (2 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers) and Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (115 citations), Epidemiology (227 citations), Reproductive Medicine (44 citations), Microbiology (28 citations) and Oncology (93 citations). C Natter has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Grimm, Stephan Polterauer, Alexander Reinthaller, Georg Heinze, J Rahhal, Lukas Hefler, Georg Stary, Clemens Tempfer, Sophie Pils and P Speiser. Their work appears in journals such as Obstetrics and Gynecology, British Journal of Cancer, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cellular Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact