P. S. Wang

6 papers receiving 1.1k citations

P. S. Wang's Hit Papers

Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication 2010 · 671 citations
6710+5+10Years since publication200400600

Peers

P. S. Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Applied Psychology 163
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 214
  • Clinical Psychology 312
  • Social Psychology 262
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 22
Replace Paul E. Ruskin with:
Paul E. Ruskin United States
Harold Alan Pincus United States
Susanne Röhr Germany
Prabhat Chand India
Saeed Farooq United Kingdom
Natalie E. Hundt United States
Hiroto Ito Japan
Cynthia A. Claassen United States
Rebecca Ciacchini Italy
Carlotta Belaise Italy
P. S. Wang relative to Paul E. Ruskin United States Paul E. Ruskin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Paul E. Ruskin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. S. Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. S. Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. S. Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. S. Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. S. Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. S. Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. S. Wang. The network helps show where P. S. Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside P. S. Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. S. Wang Line = papers co-authored together P. S. Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Hit paper breakdown →
2010671
2 2007272
3 2007118
4 200074
5 202410
6 20086

About P. S. Wang

P. S. Wang is a scholar working on Pharmacology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (1 paper), Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper), Treatment of Major Depression (1 paper), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (1 paper) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (163 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (214 citations), Clinical Psychology (312 citations), Social Psychology (262 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (22 citations). P. S. Wang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ronald C. Kessler, Kenneth B. Wells, Ramin Mojtabai, Benjamin G. Druss, Mark Olfson, Nancy A. Sampson, R. Jin, Harold Alan Pincus, Colin R. Dormuth and Sebastian Schneeweiß. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Psychological Medicine, Journal of Affective Disorders, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact