R. Jin

3.1k citations
6 papers · 1.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

R. Jin

6 papers receiving 1.0k citations

R. Jin's Hit Papers

Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication 2010 · 671 citations
6710+5+10Years since publication200400600

Peers

R. Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Applied Psychology 167
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 271
  • Clinical Psychology 321
  • Social Psychology 286
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 115
Replace Mark Floyd with:
Mark Floyd United States
Kate Muse United Kingdom
Nina Grant United Kingdom
Fedra Ottolini Italy
Alexa Bagnell Canada
Narsimha R. Pinninti United States
Michael Villanueva United States
Mindy Herman-Stahl United States
James P. Choca United States
Mojtaba Habibi Iran
R. Jin relative to Mark Floyd United States Mark Floyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Mark Floyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Jin. The network helps show where R. Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Jin Line = papers co-authored together R. Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Hit paper breakdown →
2010671
2 2008255
3 2009148
4
The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R): cornerstone in improving mental health and Mental Health Care in the United States.
200819
5 20205
6
Effect of Task-Oriented Biomechanical Perception-Balance Training on Motor Gait in Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia.
20241

About R. Jin

R. Jin is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Rehabilitation, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper), COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (1 paper), Public Health and Nutrition (1 paper) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (167 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (271 citations), Clinical Psychology (321 citations), Social Psychology (286 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 citations). R. Jin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Lebanon and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Ronald C. Kessler, Nancy A. Sampson, Kenneth B. Wells, Mark Olfson, Benjamin G. Druss, Ramin Mojtabai, P. S. Wang, Harold Alan Pincus, Giovanni de Girolamo and Josep María Haro. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Zhonghua yixue zazhi and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact