Oskar Becker

555 citations
25 papers · 204 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Oskar Becker

15 papers receiving 154 citations

Peers

Oskar Becker
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Theoretical Computer Science 48
  • History and Philosophy of Science 72
  • Philosophy 81
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 74
  • Anthropology 33
Replace Unto Remes with:
Unto Remes Finland
Günther Patzig Germany
Proclus
ca. Proclus
Leroy E. Loemker United States
Amirouche Moktefi Estonia
Philotheus Boehner
Ivan Boh United States
Guido Küng Switzerland
Ezio Vailati United States
Oskar Becker relative to Unto Remes Finland Unto Remes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Unto Remes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Oskar Becker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oskar Becker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oskar Becker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oskar Becker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Oskar Becker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oskar Becker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oskar Becker. The network helps show where Oskar Becker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Oskar Becker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Oskar Becker Line = papers co-authored together Oskar Becker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197347
2 195641
3
Zwei Untersuchungen zur antiken Logik
195733
4 197325
5
Untersuchungen über den Modalkalkül
195211
6
Das mathematische Denken der Antike
195710
7
Zur Geschichte der griechischen Mathematik
19659
8
Grösse und Grenze der mathematischen Denkweise
19598
9 20045
10 19933
11 19563
12
Husserl and Descartes
20012
13 19572
14
Dasein und Dawesen : gesammelte philosophische Aufsätze
19632
15
Dasein und Dawesen
19671
16
The Diairetic Generation of Platonic Ideal Numbers
20071
17 19551
18
Wolfgang Wieland, Die aristotelische Physik
19630
19 19750
20 19700

About Oskar Becker

Oskar Becker is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Geometry and Topology and Computational Mechanics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 204 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (8 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), Engineering and Materials Science Studies (2 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (2 papers), Physics and Engineering Research Articles (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (48 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (72 citations), Philosophy (81 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (74 citations) and Anthropology (33 citations). Frequent co-authors include Harry M. Gehman and Günther Patzig. Their work appears in journals such as Philologus, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, Archiv für Musikwissenschaft and Boston studies in the philosophy of science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact