Archiv für Musikwissenschaft

448 papers and 427 indexed citations i.

About

The 448 papers published in Archiv für Musikwissenschaft in the last decades have received a total of 427 indexed citations. Papers published in Archiv für Musikwissenschaft usually cover Music (173 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (136 papers) and Classics (87 papers) specifically the topics of Musicology and Musical Analysis (170 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (79 papers) and German Literature and Culture Studies (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archiv für Musikwissenschaft are Carl Dahlhaus, Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, Frank Hentschel, William Kinderman, Deena Weinstein, Stefan Kunze, Bernhard Meier, Bernhard Appel, Karen Painter and Johannes Lohmann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archiv für Musikwissenschaft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archiv für Musikwissenschaft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archiv für Musikwissenschaft.

Countries where authors publish in Archiv für Musikwissenschaft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archiv für Musikwissenschaft. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archiv für Musikwissenschaft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archiv für Musikwissenschaft more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025