Proclus

583 citations
18 papers · 232 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 13
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 11
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 7

Proclus

14 papers receiving 174 citations

Peers

Proclus
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Theoretical Computer Science 56
  • Philosophy 137
  • History and Philosophy of Science 47
  • Anthropology 83
  • Archeology 82
Replace Nathan Sidoli with:
Nathan Sidoli Japan
ca. Proclus
Unto Remes Finland
Sabetai Unguru United States
Jan P. Hogendijk Netherlands
A. G. Molland United Kingdom
Oskar Becker
Günther Patzig Germany
Asger Aaboe United States
Robert McRae Canada
Proclus relative to Nathan Sidoli Japan Nathan Sidoli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nathan Sidoli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Proclus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Proclus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proclus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proclus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Proclus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Proclus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Proclus. The network helps show where Proclus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Proclus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Proclus Line = papers co-authored together Proclus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 197180
2 197064
3 200745
4
Commentary on Plato's Parmenides
198919
5
Concerning the Gods and the Universe
20166
6 20214
7
Éléments de théologie
19663
8 20083
9
Proclus : The elements of theology
19942
10 20072
11 20091
12 20131
13
Theologie platonicienne. Livre i
19701
14
Proclus: Commentary on Plato's Timaeus: Volume 2, Book 2: Proclus on the Causes of the Cosmos and its Creation
20091
15 20170
16 20200
17 20100
18
Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos, Or Quadripartite: Being Four Books of the Influence of the Stars
20100

About Proclus

Proclus is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology, History, Anthropology and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (13 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (11 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers), History of Medicine Studies (4 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper) and Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (56 citations), Philosophy (137 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (47 citations), Anthropology (83 citations) and Archeology (82 citations). Frequent co-authors include Glenn R. Morrow, John Ε. Rexine, Jean Trouillard, John Μ. Rist, Dirk Baltzly, David T. Runia and L. G. Westerink. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, Tijdschrift voor Philosophie, Medical Entomology and Zoology, Princeton University Press eBooks and Cambridge University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact