孔子

696 citations
13 papers · 279 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Dover Publications eBooks (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (4 papers)Gallimard eBooks (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

孔子

11 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers

孔子
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Religious studies 26
  • Cultural Studies 31
  • Sociology and Political Science 160
  • Social Psychology 57
  • Philosophy 27
Replace Giles Gunn with:
Giles Gunn United States
Anna Otten
James Smith Allen United States
Michael Saso United States
Hazard Adams United States
Julia Ching Canada
Jeremy Gaines Germany
Terry Castle United States
Henry Corbin United States
Rei Terada United States
孔子 relative to Giles Gunn United States Giles Gunn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Giles Gunn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by 孔子

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of 孔子's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by 孔子 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites 孔子 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by 孔子

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by 孔子. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by 孔子. The network helps show where 孔子 may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside 孔子, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with 孔子 Line = papers co-authored together 孔子 links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1
Confucius analects : with selections from traditional commentaries
2003127
2
Confucius : Confucian analects, the Great learning, and the Doctrine of the mean
197186
3
Li chi : book of rites : an encyclopedia of ancient ceremonial usages, religious creeds, and social institutions
196725
4
Confucius: The Great Digest, The Unwobbling Pivot, The Analects
196914
5
四書 : 論語, 大學, 中庸, 孟子 = The four books : Confucian analects, The great learning, The doctrine of the mean, The works of Mencius
19719
6
Shih-ching: The Classic Anthology Defined by Confucius
19836
7
Les entretiens de Confucius
19894
8
The essential analects : selected passages with traditional commentary
20063
9
Gespräche : Lun Yü
19852
10
A book of heaven and the earth : stories from the Confucian analects
19731
11
The Analects : the Simon Leys translation, interpretations
20141
12
Entretiens avec ses disciples
19751
13
The most venerable book : Shang shu, also known as the Shu jing : the classic of chronicles
20140

About 孔子

孔子 is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 13 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (8 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (1 paper) and Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (26 citations), Cultural Studies (31 citations), Sociology and Political Science (160 citations), Social Psychology (57 citations) and Philosophy (27 citations). Frequent co-authors include Edward Slingerland, James Legge, Ezra Pound, Penelope A. Phillips‐Howard, Michael Nylan and Martin Palmer. Their work appears in journals such as Dover Publications eBooks, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Gallimard eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact