Michael Saso

656 citations
29 papers · 356 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Saso

22 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers

Michael Saso
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Cultural Studies 85
  • Religious studies 32
  • Sociology and Political Science 222
  • Anthropology 41
  • General Psychology 4
Replace Philip Yampolsky with:
Philip Yampolsky United States
孔子
Nina Schwartz United States
Julia Ching Canada
Elaine K. Ginsberg United States
Maxine Hong Kingston United States
Terry Castle United States
Antony Easthope United States
Mae G. Henderson United States
Yvonne Freccero United States
Michael Saso relative to Philip Yampolsky United States Philip Yampolsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Philip Yampolsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Saso

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Saso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Saso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Saso more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Saso

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Saso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Saso. The network helps show where Michael Saso may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Michael Saso, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Saso Line = papers co-authored together Michael Saso links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995106
2
Taoist Ritual in Chinese Society and History
198651
3 196744
4 197429
5 199027
6 198925
7 198012
8 19708
9
Velvet Bonds: The Chinese Family
19997
10 19787
11
The Gold Pavilion: Taoist Ways to Peace, Healing, and Long Life
19956
12 19766
13
Blue Dragon White Tiger: Taoist Rites of Passage
19905
14 19684
15 19914
16 19772
17 19802
18 19662
19 19872
20 19871

About Michael Saso

Michael Saso is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Religious studies, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 29 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (19 papers), Japanese History and Culture (6 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (5 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (2 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper) and Historical and Architectural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (85 citations), Religious studies (32 citations), Sociology and Political Science (222 citations), Anthropology (41 citations) and General Psychology (4 citations). Michael Saso has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas P. Kasulis, Wimal Dissanayake, Roger T. Ames, Thomas Merton, Hans Küng, Julia Ching, Derk Bodde, Adrian Snodgrass, David Chappell and Daniel L. Overmyer. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, The China Quarterly, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, Monumenta Serica and Pacific Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact