Julia Ching

1.1k citations
59 papers · 578 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Ching

38 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Julia Ching
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Religious studies 82
  • Cultural Studies 127
  • Sociology and Political Science 414
  • Philosophy 97
  • Anthropology 52
Replace Robert S. Ellwood with:
Robert S. Ellwood United States
Paul R. Goldin United States
Rei Terada United States
Susan S. Lanser United States
John Makeham Australia
Stephen C. Angle United States
Ann Braude United States
Sanford Budick
Peter Hallward United Kingdom
Theo D’haen Belgium
Julia Ching relative to Robert S. Ellwood United States Robert S. Ellwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Robert S. Ellwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Ching

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Ching's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Ching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Ching more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Ching

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Ching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Ching. The network helps show where Julia Ching may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Julia Ching, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Ching Line = papers co-authored together Julia Ching links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199357
2 200051
3 199541
4 198837
5
Moral Enlightenment: Leibniz And Wolff On China
199237
6 199429
7 198925
8 199723
9 199722
10 197722
11
The philosophical letters of Wang Yang-ming
197221
12 197420
13 198919
14 199119
15 198318
16 197818
17
Discovering China: European Interpretations in the Enlightenment
199212
18 197912
19 198412
20 200410

About Julia Ching

Julia Ching is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Religious studies and History, having authored 59 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (33 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (9 papers), Japanese History and Culture (8 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (82 citations), Cultural Studies (127 citations), Sociology and Political Science (414 citations), Philosophy (97 citations) and Anthropology (52 citations). Julia Ching has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hans Küng, Hoyt Cleveland Tillman, William Theodore De Bary, Norman J. Girardot, Michael Saso, Tu Weiming, Irene Bloom, Lee H. Yearley, David Dilworth and Peter Beyer. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, The Journal of Asian Studies, Monumenta Serica and Numen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact