O. Schärpf

1.7k citations
89 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

O. Schärpf

87 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

O. Schärpf
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Radiation 358
  • Condensed Matter Physics 304
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 271
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 627
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 307
Replace H. Böhn with:
H. Böhn Germany
C. E. Olsen United States
I. S. Anderson France
R. S. Raghavan United States
R. Vianden Germany
H. de Waard Netherlands
A. Sher United States
M. Hagen United Kingdom
T. Kambara Japan
Κ. Freitag Germany
O. Schärpf relative to H. Böhn Germany H. Böhn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
H. Böhn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. Schärpf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. Schärpf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Schärpf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Schärpf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. Schärpf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Schärpf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Schärpf. The network helps show where O. Schärpf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside O. Schärpf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O. Schärpf Line = papers co-authored together O. Schärpf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986146
2 1993133
3 199663
4 199958
5 199758
6 198751
7 198744
8 199443
9 198838
10 199034
11 198833
12 199129
13 198328
14 199427
15 197827
16 196725
17 199225
18 199223
19 199022
20 199720

About O. Schärpf

O. Schärpf is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (31 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (22 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (16 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (16 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (15 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (12 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (9 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (358 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (304 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (271 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (627 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (307 citations). O. Schärpf has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include H. Capellmann, D. Dubbers, J. Last, P. Bopp, S. J. Freedman, I. S. Anderson, E. Nembach, Barbara J. Gabryś, Thomas Brückel and W. Petry. Their work appears in journals such as Physica B Condensed Matter, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of Applied Crystallography, Europhysics Letters (EPL) and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact