O. Piot

1.1k citations
24 papers · 821 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

O. Piot

23 papers receiving 752 citations

Peers

O. Piot
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 494
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 79
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 56
  • Sensory Systems 37
  • Physiology 183
Replace Carol J. Grossman with:
Carol J. Grossman United Kingdom
Mark D. Black United States
Philippe Pichat France
Hideko Yamamoto Japan
Akira Horita United States
Robert A. McArthur Italy
Jun’ichi Semba Japan
J.M. Stutzmann France
J�rgen Engel Sweden
Dinah Weissmann France
O. Piot relative to Carol J. Grossman United Kingdom Carol J. Grossman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Carol J. Grossman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. Piot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. Piot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Piot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Piot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. Piot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Piot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Piot. The network helps show where O. Piot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside O. Piot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O. Piot Line = papers co-authored together O. Piot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993305
2 199170
3 199262
4 199457
5 199245
6 199141
7 199135
8 199530
9 199428
10 199023
11 199323
12
The pharmacology of cyclopyrrolone derivatives acting at the GABAA/benzodiazepine receptor.
199218
13 199515
14 199415
15 199313
16 199412
17
Pharmacological properties and mechanism of action of the cyclopyrrolones.
199311
18 19939
19 19904
20 19972

About O. Piot

O. Piot is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 24 papers that have together received 821 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (9 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (2 papers) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (494 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (79 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (56 citations), Sensory Systems (37 citations) and Physiology (183 citations). O. Piot has collaborated with scholars based in France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include J.C. Blanchard, Georg Andrees Böhme, Adam Doble, J.M. Stutzmann, M. Reibaud, Corentin Bon, Jean‐Charles Blanchard, Jean Rataud, B.P. Roques and C. Guérémy. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, British Journal of Pharmacology, Clinical Neuropharmacology and Behavioural Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact