O. Dapunt

157 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

O. Dapunt
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 345
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 892
  • Reproductive Medicine 327
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.0k
  • Biological Psychiatry 79
Replace Lene Heickendorff with:
Lene Heickendorff Denmark
Jacqueline Limpens Netherlands
Vibeke Videm Norway
Peter B. Licht Denmark
Michael J. Paidas United States
Albert Wolthuis Belgium
H. Lévesque France
Laurence Seidel Belgium
Gisele Zandman‐Goddard Israel
Stefan G. Tullius United States
O. Dapunt relative to Lene Heickendorff Denmark Lene Heickendorff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Lene Heickendorff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. Dapunt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. Dapunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Dapunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Dapunt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. Dapunt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Dapunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Dapunt. The network helps show where O. Dapunt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside O. Dapunt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O. Dapunt Line = papers co-authored together O. Dapunt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 166 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008198
2 1994189
3 1996122
4 1998117
5 2012103
6 2011103
7 198990
8 199486
9 199483
10 198981
11
Neopterin as a prognostic indicator in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
198681
12 198676
13 201673
14 199672
15 199868
16 198757
17
Steroid receptors and hormone-dependent neoplasia
198052
18 199551
19 201545
20 199344

About O. Dapunt

O. Dapunt is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Immunology, having authored 166 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (33 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (26 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (14 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (12 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (12 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (11 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (11 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (345 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (892 citations), Reproductive Medicine (327 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.0k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (79 citations). O. Dapunt has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christian Marth, G. Daxenbichler, K. Heim, H. Schröcksnadel, Alain G. Zeimet, Jerry Easo, A. Bergant, Ernst Weigang, Hanno Ulmer and Randall B. Griepp. Their work appears in journals such as The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology and European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact