O. Dapunt

153 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

O. Dapunt
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Biological Psychiatry 79
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 210
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 904
  • Reproductive Medicine 216
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 509
Replace Lene Heickendorff with:
Lene Heickendorff Denmark
Vibeke Videm Norway
Luis J. Jara Mexico
Stefan G. Tullius United States
Maria G. Tektonidou Greece
Jacqueline Limpens Netherlands
Jozélio Freire de Carvalho Brazil
Giacomo Emmi Italy
H. Lévesque France
Annika E. Michelsen Norway
O. Dapunt relative to Lene Heickendorff Denmark Lene Heickendorff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Lene Heickendorff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by O. Dapunt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of O. Dapunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by O. Dapunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites O. Dapunt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by O. Dapunt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by O. Dapunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by O. Dapunt. The network helps show where O. Dapunt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside O. Dapunt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with O. Dapunt Line = papers co-authored together O. Dapunt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 166 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008201
2 1994190
3 1996123
4 1998117
5 2012108
6 2011104
7 198991
8 199488
9 199483
10 198981
11
Neopterin as a prognostic indicator in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
198681
12 198676
13 201675
14 199671
15 199868
16 198757
17
Steroid receptors and hormone-dependent neoplasia
198052
18 199551
19 201545
20 199344

About O. Dapunt

O. Dapunt is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Immunology and Epidemiology, having authored 166 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (23 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (21 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (12 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (11 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (10 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (9 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (8 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (79 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (210 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (904 citations), Reproductive Medicine (216 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (509 citations). O. Dapunt has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christian Marth, G. Daxenbichler, K. Heim, Alain G. Zeimet, Jerry Easo, H. Schröcksnadel, A. Bergant, Hanno Ulmer, Ernst Weigang and Randall B. Griepp. Their work appears in journals such as The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology and European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact