N.P. Chmel

760 citations
31 papers · 605 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

N.P. Chmel

30 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers

N.P. Chmel
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Inorganic Chemistry 114
  • Organic Chemistry 181
  • Biomaterials 78
  • Spectroscopy 95
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 105
Replace Claudia Pigliacelli with:
Claudia Pigliacelli Italy
Elena V. Bichenkova United Kingdom
Hana Weitman Israel
Renato Bonomi Italy
Yosuke Hisamatsu Japan
Sebastiano Di Pietro Italy
Roger Bresolí‐Obach Spain
Samuel J. Bradberry Ireland
Tomáš Kraus Czechia
Maria J. Prieto Spain
N.P. Chmel relative to Claudia Pigliacelli Italy Claudia Pigliacelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Claudia Pigliacelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.P. Chmel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.P. Chmel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.P. Chmel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.P. Chmel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.P. Chmel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.P. Chmel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.P. Chmel. The network helps show where N.P. Chmel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N.P. Chmel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.P. Chmel Line = papers co-authored together N.P. Chmel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016107
2 200979
3 201178
4 201838
5 200731
6 201425
7 201322
8 201621
9 201820
10 202019
11 201416
12 201314
13 201814
14 201014
15 202113
16 201212
17 201312
18 201111
19 20208
20 20218

About N.P. Chmel

N.P. Chmel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Oncology and Spectroscopy, having authored 31 papers that have together received 605 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (7 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (4 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (4 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (3 papers) and Crystal structures of chemical compounds (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (114 citations), Organic Chemistry (181 citations), Biomaterials (78 citations), Spectroscopy (95 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (105 citations). N.P. Chmel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alison Rodger, Peter Scott, Guy J. Clarkson, Suzanne E. Howson, L.E.N. Allan, R. Van Gorkum, Robert J. Deeth, Alice J. Rothnie, Anne Straube and Daniel Röth. Their work appears in journals such as Dalton Transactions, Chirality, RSC Advances, The Analyst and Chemical Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact