Nolan E. Penn

25 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Nolan E. Penn
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 51
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 49
  • General Health Professions 57
  • Social Psychology 47
  • Clinical Psychology 44
Replace Suyeon Lee with:
Suyeon Lee South Korea
Janet H. Kane United States
Joseph Church United States
Sean N. Halpin United States
Christopher M. Swoboda United States
Elizabeth Clark United States
Fam te Poel Netherlands
Arielle S. Gillman United States
Richard D. McAnulty United States
Elizabeth Kudadjie-Gyamfi United States
Nolan E. Penn relative to Suyeon Lee South Korea Suyeon Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Suyeon Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nolan E. Penn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nolan E. Penn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nolan E. Penn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nolan E. Penn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nolan E. Penn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nolan E. Penn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nolan E. Penn. The network helps show where Nolan E. Penn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nolan E. Penn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nolan E. Penn Line = papers co-authored together Nolan E. Penn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199560
2 199538
3
Breast self-examination: knowledge, attitudes, and performance among black women.
198934
4 198132
5 198428
6 200020
7 198815
8 198614
9 199214
10 19929
11
The need and value of breast self-examination.
19888
12 20007
13 19696
14 19856
15 19885
16
The oddity concept in severely retarded children.
19695
17 19665
18 19714
19 20024
20 19824

About Nolan E. Penn

Nolan E. Penn is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Oncology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (51 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (49 citations), General Health Professions (57 citations), Social Psychology (47 citations) and Clinical Psychology (44 citations). Nolan E. Penn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Venezuela. Frequent co-authors include Snehendu B. Kar, Ruth Enid Zambrana, John Skinner, Daniel F. Kripke, Muriel N. Nesbitt, Leslie E. Spieth, James A. Kulik, Stephen R. Shuchter, Jennifer Gutiérrez and Oliver W. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Prenatal Diagnosis, Health Psychology, Journal of Community Psychology, The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse and Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact