Countries where authors publish in npj Microgravity
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in npj Microgravity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in npj Microgravity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites npj Microgravity more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in npj Microgravity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in npj Microgravity.
About npj Microgravity
The 564 papers published in npj Microgravity in the last decades have received a total of 9.6k indexed citations . Papers published in npj Microgravity usually cover Aging (35 papers), Physiology (353 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (80 papers), Physiology (17 papers) and Aerospace Engineering (91 papers) specifically the topics of Spaceflight effects on biology (350 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (60 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (58 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (51 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (35 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (32 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (27 papers) and Solidification and crystal growth phenomena (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in npj Microgravity are Gilles R. Clement, Duane L. Pierson, Brian E. Crucian, William J. Tarver, Tyson J. Brunstetter, Ajitkumar P. Mulavara, Satish Kumar Mehta, Raymond P. Stowe, Virginia E. Wotring and John Kelly Smith.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.