Noah Brazer

826 citations
6 papers · 72 · h-index 3

Impact in

    • Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
    • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
    • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
    • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility

Papers in

    • Mycobacterium research and diagnosis 3
    • Respiratory viral infections research 1
    • Bacterial Infections and Vaccines 3

Noah Brazer

6 papers receiving 71 citations

Peers

Noah Brazer
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Microbiology 3
  • Infectious Diseases 22
  • Aging 2
  • Microbiology 7
  • Clinical Biochemistry 4
Replace Byron Brook with:
Byron Brook United States
Irina Karpova Russia
Tian Gong China
Maria Rodriguez United States
Danielle A. Wagner United States
Louise Downs United Kingdom
Ruth Thom United Kingdom
Prajakta Warang United States
Javier García‐González Spain
Ramesh Kumar India
Noah Brazer relative to Byron Brook United States Byron Brook's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Byron Brook · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Noah Brazer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Brazer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Brazer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Brazer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Brazer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Brazer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Brazer. The network helps show where Noah Brazer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noah Brazer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Noah Brazer Line = papers co-authored together Noah Brazer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 202434
2 202231
3 20233
4 20252
5 20251
6 20251

About Noah Brazer

Noah Brazer is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology and Urology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 72 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (3 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (1 paper), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (1 paper), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Respiratory viral infections research (1 paper) and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (3 citations), Infectious Diseases (22 citations), Aging (2 citations), Microbiology (7 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (4 citations). Noah Brazer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles Y. Chiu, Jessica Streithorst, Venice Servellita, Steve Miller, Timothy M. Blicharz, Danielle Ingebrigtsen, Jesus Ching, Michael R. Wilson, Brian D. O’Donovan and Amy P. Wong. Their work appears in journals such as Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Nature Medicine, Scientific Reports, JCI Insight and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact