Noah Berlow
Impact in
- Genetics top 2%
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 5
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods 9
- Co-authors
- Ranadip Pal (15 shared papers)Charles Keller (21 shared papers)Lara Emily Davis (6 shared papers)Bernard Séguin (3 shared papers)Saad Haider (4 shared papers)Ivan Spasojević (1 shared paper)Kristin Schroeder (1 shared paper)Katherine L. Misuraca (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuro-Oncology (3 papers)Oncotarget (3 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Nature Medicine (2 papers)Skeletal Muscle (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Noah Berlow
43 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Noah Berlow's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Genetics 434
- Cancer Research 163
- Neurology 151
- Molecular Biology 563
- Oncology 175
Countries citing papers authored by Noah Berlow
This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Berlow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Berlow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Berlow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Berlow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Berlow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Berlow. The network helps show where Noah Berlow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Noah Berlow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Functionally defined therapeutic targets in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 535 |
| 2 | 2015 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 11 |
About Noah Berlow
Noah Berlow is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (9 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (7 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (5 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (3 papers) and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (434 citations), Cancer Research (163 citations), Neurology (151 citations), Molecular Biology (563 citations) and Oncology (175 citations). Noah Berlow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ranadip Pal, Charles Keller, Lara Emily Davis, Bernard Séguin, Saad Haider, Ivan Spasojević, Kristin Schroeder, Katherine L. Misuraca, Kyle Gregory Halvorson and Kelly L. Barton. Their work appears in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, Oncotarget, PLoS ONE, Nature Medicine and Skeletal Muscle.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.