Countries where authors publish in Molecular Case Studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Case Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Case Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Case Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Molecular Case Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Case Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Case Studies.
About Molecular Case Studies
The 417 papers published in Molecular Case Studies in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Molecular Case Studies usually cover Cancer Research (83 papers), Genetics (147 papers), Genetics (49 papers), Hematology (38 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (54 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Rare Diseases (81 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (67 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (51 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (43 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (29 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (27 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (22 papers) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Case Studies are Clary B. Clish, Funda Meric‐Bernstam, Stephen B. Montgomery, Laure Frésard, Wendy K. Chung, Stephen F. Kingsmore, Ami S. Bhatt, Lukas D. Wartman, Kyle Retterer and Can Fıçıcıoğlu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.