Nir Fresco

559 citations
34 papers · 252 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nir Fresco

32 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

Nir Fresco
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • History and Philosophy of Science 74
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 122
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 91
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
  • Safety Research 15
Replace Alistair Isaac with:
Alistair Isaac United Kingdom
Thomas Icard United States
Joe Dewhurst United Kingdom
Niki Pfeifer Germany
Gregory Wheeler Portugal
Konstantine Arkoudas United States
Lucas Rosenblatt Argentina
Τ. Ε. Wilkerson United Kingdom
Paul Égré France
Panu Raatikainen Finland
Nir Fresco relative to Alistair Isaac United Kingdom Alistair Isaac's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Alistair Isaac · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nir Fresco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nir Fresco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nir Fresco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nir Fresco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nir Fresco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nir Fresco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nir Fresco. The network helps show where Nir Fresco may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Nir Fresco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nir Fresco Line = papers co-authored together Nir Fresco links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201345
2 201437
3 201329
4 201816
5 201016
6 201914
7 202112
8 201310
9 20128
10 20148
11 20125
12
Philosophy of Information: An Introduction
20135
13 20165
14 20154
15 20214
16 20084
17 20213
18 20223
19 20133
20 20143

About Nir Fresco

Nir Fresco is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 34 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (18 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers) and Software Engineering Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (74 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (122 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (91 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations) and Safety Research (15 citations). Nir Fresco has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Giuseppe Primiero, Luciano Floridi, Marty J. Wolf, Marcin Miłkowski, Simona Ginsburg, Eva Jablonka, B. Jack Copeland, Oron Shagrir, Andrew Iliadis and Patrick Allo. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Minds and Machines, Philosophy & Technology, Philosophy of Science and The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact