Ningyuan Chen

1.1k citations
64 papers · 503 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Ningyuan Chen

60 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Ningyuan Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Marketing 167
  • Management Information Systems 119
  • Management Science and Operations Research 126
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 62
  • Neurology 35
Replace Ludo Van der Heyden with:
Ludo Van der Heyden United States
Krishnamurthy Iyer United States
Vahideh Manshadi United States
Shaddin Dughmi United States
Ahmad Baraani-Dastjerdi Iran
Esther David Israel
Xia Cao China
Hanyang Luo China
Sujoy Bag India
Ningyuan Chen relative to Ludo Van der Heyden United States Ludo Van der Heyden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17.3×
Ludo Van der Heyden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ningyuan Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ningyuan Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ningyuan Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ningyuan Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ningyuan Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ningyuan Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ningyuan Chen. The network helps show where Ningyuan Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ningyuan Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ningyuan Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ningyuan Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201849
2 202143
3 201834
4 202031
5 202131
6 202129
7 201328
8 201319
9 201617
10 201716
11 202215
12 202115
13 201915
14 201914
15 202012
16 202112
17 202110
18 201710
19 20219
20 20197

About Ningyuan Chen

Ningyuan Chen is a scholar working on Marketing, Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 64 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (19 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (14 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (10 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (9 papers), Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research (7 papers), Economic theories and models (5 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (5 papers) and Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (167 citations), Management Information Systems (119 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (126 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (62 citations) and Neurology (35 citations). Ningyuan Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Guillermo Gallego, Mariana Olvera‐Cravioto, Ying‐Ju Chen, Xiao Lei, Adam N. Elmachtoub, Ming Hu, Javad Nasiry, Steven Kou, Hüseyin Topaloğlu and Paat Rusmevichientong. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Operations Research, Production and Operations Management, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management and Service Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact