Ning Ding
Impact in
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 7
-
- Autophagy in Disease and Therapy 4
- Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases 3
- Co-authors
- Xiujie Zhang (1 shared paper)Tieying Shi (1 shared paper)Tongtong Jiang (1 shared paper)Deliang Wen (5 shared papers)Yanan Ma (3 shared papers)Jiajin Hu (3 shared papers)Ming Gao (2 shared papers)Xiaotong Wei (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Aging (2 papers)Medicine (2 papers)Dyes and Pigments (2 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)Acta Psychologica (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaSouth KoreaEthiopia
In The Last Decade
Ning Ding
49 papers receiving 904 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Research and Theory 9
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 84
- Hematology 46
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 29
- Immunology 84
Countries citing papers authored by Ning Ding
This map shows the geographic impact of Ning Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ning Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ning Ding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ning Ding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ning Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ning Ding. The network helps show where Ning Ding may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ning Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 156 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 102 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 50 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 11 |
About Ning Ding
Ning Ding is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Hematology, Immunology and Oncology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 918 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (4 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers), Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (3 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (3 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (3 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers) and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (9 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (84 citations), Hematology (46 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations) and Immunology (84 citations). Ning Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, South Korea and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Xiujie Zhang, Tieying Shi, Tongtong Jiang, Deliang Wen, Yanan Ma, Jiajin Hu, Ming Gao, Xiaotong Wei, Lei Liu and Yang Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Aging, Medicine, Dyes and Pigments, Scientific Reports and Acta Psychologica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.