Nina Auerbach
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 7
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 5
-
- Race, History, and American Society 2
- Co-authors
- Karl Kroeber (1 shared paper)Joseph A. Kestner (2 shared papers)Kelly R. Monk (1 shared paper)U. C. Knoepflmacher (1 shared paper)Sarah C. Petersen (1 shared paper)Torsten Schöneberg (1 shared paper)Ines Liebscher (1 shared paper)Sven Rothemund (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature (5 papers)Modern Language Quarterly (3 papers)Victorian Literature and Culture (3 papers)ELH (2 papers)Feminist Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyGermany
In The Last Decade
Nina Auerbach
43 papers receiving 623 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Literature and Literary Theory 446
- Cultural Studies 177
- Music 58
- History 180
- Museology 59
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Auerbach
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Auerbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Auerbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Auerbach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Auerbach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Auerbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Auerbach. The network helps show where Nina Auerbach may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Auerbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 215 | |
| 2 | 1985 | 121 | |
| 3 | 1978 | 117 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 101 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 95 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 54 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 40 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 36 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 28 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 26 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 26 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1981 | 13 | |
| 18 | Dracula : authoritative text, contexts, reviews and reactions, dramatic and film variations, criticism | 1997 | 12 |
| 19 | Communities of Women | 1978 | 11 |
| 20 | 1975 | 9 |
About Nina Auerbach
Nina Auerbach is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Cultural Studies and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (7 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (5 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (2 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers) and Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (446 citations), Cultural Studies (177 citations), Music (58 citations), History (180 citations) and Museology (59 citations). Nina Auerbach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Karl Kroeber, Joseph A. Kestner, Kelly R. Monk, U. C. Knoepflmacher, Sarah C. Petersen, Torsten Schöneberg, Ines Liebscher, Sven Rothemund, Maxi Cöster and Amit Mogha. Their work appears in journals such as Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature, Modern Language Quarterly, Victorian Literature and Culture, ELH and Feminist Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.