Nigel Dower

768 citations
44 papers · 483 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Nigel Dower

38 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Nigel Dower
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Political Science and International Relations 209
  • Development 23
  • Sociology and Political Science 230
  • General Social Sciences 16
  • Education 142
Replace Tom C. McCaskie with:
Tom C. McCaskie United Kingdom
Felix K. Ekechi United States
Gustavo Lins Ribeiro Brazil
Archie Mafeje Egypt
Carl Boggs United States
Ruth Marshall-Fratani Ivory Coast
Franz Josef Hinkelammert Costa Rica
Neve Gordon Israel
Sérgio Costa Germany
Elizabeth Isichei New Zealand
Nigel Dower relative to Tom C. McCaskie United Kingdom Tom C. McCaskie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Tom C. McCaskie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Dower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Dower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Dower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Dower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Dower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Dower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Dower. The network helps show where Nigel Dower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Nigel Dower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nigel Dower Line = papers co-authored together Nigel Dower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200388
2
World Ethics: The New Agenda
199870
3
Global citizenship : a critical reader
200265
4 200043
5 200827
6 200419
7 199217
8 200716
9 199716
10 200515
11
World poverty: Challenge and response
198315
12
John Macmurray: Critical Perspectives
200214
13 201413
14
The Ethics of War and Peace
20097
15 20106
16 20106
17
Ethics and environmental responsibility
19895
18 20005
19 20044
20 19884

About Nigel Dower

Nigel Dower is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Development, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 44 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (8 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (6 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (6 papers), Human Rights and Development (4 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Environmental law and policy (3 papers) and International Development and Aid (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (209 citations), Development (23 citations), Sociology and Political Science (230 citations), General Social Sciences (16 citations) and Education (142 citations). Nigel Dower has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Onora O’Neill, John Mark Williams, David M. Fergusson, Charles K. Wilber, Kenneth P. Jameson, Jan Woleński, Hélène Leblanc and Matthew E. Gladden. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Global Ethics, Environmental Values, Journal of Religion in Africa, European Journal of Development Research and Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact