Nida Ali
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 1%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
Papers in
-
- Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior 9
-
- Stress Responses and Cortisol 10
- Co-authors
- Jens C. Pruessner (10 shared papers)Urs M. Nater (5 shared papers)Jonas P. Nitschke (4 shared papers)Jo Cutler (1 shared paper)Matthew A J Apps (1 shared paper)Paul Forbes (1 shared paper)Patricia Lockwood (1 shared paper)Claus Lamm (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Nida Ali
28 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Nida Ali's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Behavioral Neuroscience 367
- Biological Psychiatry 56
- Clinical Psychology 465
- Social Psychology 405
- Applied Psychology 80
Countries citing papers authored by Nida Ali
This map shows the geographic impact of Nida Ali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nida Ali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nida Ali more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nida Ali
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nida Ali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nida Ali. The network helps show where Nida Ali may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nida Ali, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Resilience during uncertainty? Greater social connectedness during COVID‐19 lockdown is associated with reduced distress and fatigue Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 235 |
| 2 | 2020 | 178 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 176 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 158 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 129 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 66 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 55 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 49 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 5 |
About Nida Ali
Nida Ali is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (10 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (9 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (4 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (367 citations), Biological Psychiatry (56 citations), Clinical Psychology (465 citations), Social Psychology (405 citations) and Applied Psychology (80 citations). Nida Ali has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Austria and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Jens C. Pruessner, Urs M. Nater, Jonas P. Nitschke, Jo Cutler, Matthew A J Apps, Paul Forbes, Patricia Lockwood, Claus Lamm, Andrea González and Meir Steiner. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Clinical Psychological Science and Clinical and Experimental Dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.