Nicolas Clément

1.0k citations
57 papers · 715 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Nicolas Clément

53 papers receiving 698 citations

Peers

Nicolas Clément
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Electrochemistry 104
  • Bioengineering 68
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 427
  • Biomedical Engineering 264
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 181
Replace Sophie Matlis with:
Sophie Matlis Israel
C. I. Smith United Kingdom
Vitor Brasiliense France
Ziyong Shen China
Songjun Hou United Kingdom
Georgy L. Pakhomov Russia
Roman G. Parkhomenko Russia
Deirdre E. Smith United States
Inga Potapova Germany
Miguel A. Hernández‐Rodríguez Spain
Nicolas Clément relative to Sophie Matlis Israel Sophie Matlis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Sophie Matlis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Clément

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Clément's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Clément with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Clément more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Clément

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Clément. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Clément. The network helps show where Nicolas Clément may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicolas Clément, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicolas Clément Line = papers co-authored together Nicolas Clément links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201686
2 201343
3 201841
4 201739
5 201234
6 202031
7 201328
8 200727
9 201426
10 200824
11 201123
12 201421
13 201418
14 202117
15 202316
16 201316
17 201016
18 201014
19 201714
20 202212

About Nicolas Clément

Nicolas Clément is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Electrochemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Molecular Biology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 715 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (15 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (13 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (8 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (7 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (6 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (104 citations), Bioengineering (68 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (427 citations), Biomedical Engineering (264 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (181 citations). Nicolas Clément has collaborated with scholars based in France, Japan and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include D. Vuillaume, D. Théron, Guilhem Larrieu, Katsuhiko Nishiguchi, Akira Fujiwara, Kacem Smaali, Christophe Demaille, Arnaud Chovin, G. Patriarche and Hassan Tanbakuchi. Their work appears in journals such as Small, Applied Physics Letters, ChemElectroChem, Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française and ACS Nano.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact