Nicolas Chrestian

24 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Nicolas Chrestian
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 128
  • Genetics 28
  • Neurology 21
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 52
  • Molecular Biology 169
Replace Fatima Jaffer with:
Fatima Jaffer United Kingdom
Esther Gill Germany
Cinzia Bertolin Italy
Gong‐Lu Liu China
Anna Maija Saukkonen Finland
Emilia K. Bijlsma Netherlands
Kimberly Schadt United States
Rosanna Trovato Italy
Jacopo Baldacci Italy
Susan E Tomlinson Australia
Nicolas Chrestian relative to Fatima Jaffer United Kingdom Fatima Jaffer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fatima Jaffer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Chrestian

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Chrestian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Chrestian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Chrestian more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Chrestian

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Chrestian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Chrestian. The network helps show where Nicolas Chrestian may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicolas Chrestian, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicolas Chrestian Line = papers co-authored together Nicolas Chrestian links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200758
2 200841
3 202024
4 202021
5 201520
6 200718
7 202016
8 201611
9 200611
10 20219
11 20088
12 20206
13 20226
14 20216
15 20225
16 20204
17 20073
18 20232
19 20222
20 20082

About Nicolas Chrestian

Nicolas Chrestian is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Neurology and Genetics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (7 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (4 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (4 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (3 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Nuclear Structure and Function (3 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (128 citations), Genetics (28 citations), Neurology (21 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (52 citations) and Molecular Biology (169 citations). Nicolas Chrestian has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Nicolas Dupré, Bernard Brais, Jean‐Pierre Bouchard, Denis Brunet, Guy A. Rouleau, Jack Puymirat, François Gros‐Louis, Jean Mathieu, Elsa Rossignol and Steve Verreault. Their work appears in journals such as Neuromuscular Disorders, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Neurology, Frontiers in Neurology and Annals of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact