Nicholas Light

5.1k citations
60 papers · 2.9k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Light

60 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Nicholas Light
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Biomaterials 830
  • Animal Science and Zoology 608
  • Rehabilitation 269
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 234
  • Dermatology 211
Replace Trevor J. Sims with:
Trevor J. Sims United Kingdom
Keith G. Danielson United States
Sudha Agarwal United States
Jaroslava Halper United States
Gundula Schulze‐Tanzil Germany
Helen Muir Denmark
S Bazin France
L. Jack Windsor United States
Gaston Godeau France
Dorne R. Yager United States
Nicholas Light relative to Trevor J. Sims United Kingdom Trevor J. Sims's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Trevor J. Sims · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Light

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Light's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Light with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Light more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Light

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Light. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Light. The network helps show where Nicholas Light may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Light, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Light Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Light links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987250
2
Connective Tissue in Meat and Meat Products
1989237
3 1984221
4 1985204
5 2002166
6 1985147
7 2013117
8 200294
9 198086
10 199284
11 198281
12 197974
13 197367
14 198767
15 197962
16 198558
17 201856
18 198055
19 198752
20
Cook-Chill Catering: Technology and Management
199048

About Nicholas Light

Nicholas Light is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology and Cancer Research, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Collagen: Extraction and Characterization (20 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (6 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (5 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (5 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (5 papers), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (4 papers) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (830 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (608 citations), Rehabilitation (269 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (234 citations) and Dermatology (211 citations). Nicholas Light has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Allen J. Bailey, Catherine Stanton, Victor C. Duance, Trevor J. Sims, C. A. Voyle, K A Smolenski, C. R. Lovell, M. Dyson, S. R. Young and Breda Cullen. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Journal, Meat Science, British Journal of Dermatology, FEBS Letters and Journal of Chromatography A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact