Nicholas Harper

454 citations
6 papers · 92 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Nicholas Harper

5 papers receiving 90 citations

Peers

Nicholas Harper
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 25
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 56
  • Computational Mathematics 1
  • Pharmacy 7
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 17
Replace Sarah A. MacLeish with:
Sarah A. MacLeish United States
Daniel Cromb United Kingdom
E. Mercuri United Kingdom
Anna Scheuchenegger Austria
Juha Pyykkö Finland
Teresa Chanlaw United States
Cathelijne F. van Heteren Netherlands
Javier Estañ-Capell Spain
Margreet Meems Netherlands
K. Jolley United States
Nicholas Harper relative to Sarah A. MacLeish United States Sarah A. MacLeish's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sarah A. MacLeish · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Harper. The network helps show where Nicholas Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Harper Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Harper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 201746
2 200929
3 20209
4 20247
5 20241
6 20250

About Nicholas Harper

Nicholas Harper is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Organic Chemistry, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 92 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (1 paper), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (1 paper), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1 paper), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Synthesis and biological activity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (25 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (56 citations), Computational Mathematics (1 citation), Pharmacy (7 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (17 citations). Nicholas Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca M. Reynolds, J Lynch, Fiona C. Denison, Nigel Kennea, Nuria Gonzalez‐Cinca, Gareth Ball, Julia Wurie, Shona Falconer, Andrew Chew and Mary Rutherford. Their work appears in journals such as Microbiology Spectrum, NeuroImage Clinical, Scientific Reports, Annals of Neurology and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact