Daniel Cromb

545 citations
25 papers · 106 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Cromb

20 papers receiving 105 citations

Peers

Daniel Cromb
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 39
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 38
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 15
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 26
  • Epidemiology 34
Replace J‐C Becher with:
J‐C Becher United Kingdom
Angelos Pappas Greece
Rebecca E. Langhough United States
Shujuan Zeng China
C W Gowen United States
H N Lafeber Netherlands
Raluca Pana Canada
Sneha Anand United Kingdom
Rebecca Stainman United States
E. Mercuri United Kingdom
Daniel Cromb relative to J‐C Becher United Kingdom J‐C Becher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
J‐C Becher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cromb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cromb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cromb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cromb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cromb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cromb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cromb. The network helps show where Daniel Cromb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Cromb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Cromb Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Cromb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201140
2 202312
3 20239
4 20236
5 20236
6 20245
7 20244
8 20243
9 20243
10 20163
11 20233
12 20252
13 20232
14 20242
15 20231
16 20241
17 20151
18 20241
19 20201
20 20241

About Daniel Cromb

Daniel Cromb is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 106 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (11 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (6 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (6 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (3 papers) and MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (39 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (38 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (15 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (26 citations) and Epidemiology (34 citations). Daniel Cromb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mary Rutherford, Serena J. Counsell, Magda Tsolaki, Catherine S. Hurt, Lars‐Olof Wahlund, D. Whitehead, Bruno Vellas, Hilkka Soininen, Joseph V. Hajnal and Simon Lovestone. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Journal of the American Heart Association, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Placenta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact