Daniel Cromb

645 citations
37 papers · 308 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Cromb

30 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

Daniel Cromb
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 117
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 99
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 64
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 38
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 14
Replace Tanya Poppe with:
Tanya Poppe New Zealand
Knut Jørgen Bjuland Norway
Regina L. Triplett United States
Huiying Kang China
Camilla O’Keeffe United Kingdom
David Q. Stoye United Kingdom
Jakki Brandon United Kingdom
Alexandra F. Bonthrone United Kingdom
Wai Yen Loh Australia
Emma J. Telford United Kingdom
Daniel Cromb relative to Tanya Poppe New Zealand Tanya Poppe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Tanya Poppe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Cromb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Cromb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Cromb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Cromb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Cromb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Cromb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Cromb. The network helps show where Daniel Cromb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Cromb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Cromb Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Cromb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021114
2 201143
3 202322
4 202217
5 202317
6 202313
7 20249
8 20239
9 20238
10 20247
11 20246
12 20244
13 20244
14 20244
15 20234
16 20244
17 20244
18 20233
19 20163
20 20232

About Daniel Cromb

Daniel Cromb is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (7 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (6 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (5 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (117 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (99 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (64 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (38 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (14 citations). Daniel Cromb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mary Rutherford, Serena J. Counsell, Anthony N. Price, Joseph V. Hajnal, Alexandra F. Bonthrone, Catherine S. Hurt, D. Whitehead, Magda Tsolaki, Hilkka S. Soininen and Andrew D. Simmons. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Journal of the American Heart Association, Scientific Reports, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact