Nicholas Dacre

44 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Nicholas Dacre
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 67
  • Management Information Systems 69
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 71
  • Management Science and Operations Research 83
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 27
Replace Aurangzeab Butt with:
Aurangzeab Butt Finland
Ming Chi China
Kevin P. Grant United States
Roula Michaelides United Kingdom
Maxim Miterev Sweden
Vered Holzmann Israel
Susan C. Morton United Kingdom
Celbert M. Himang Philippines
Riaz Ahmed Pakistan
Li Y China
Nicholas Dacre relative to Aurangzeab Butt Finland Aurangzeab Butt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Aurangzeab Butt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Dacre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Dacre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Dacre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Dacre more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Dacre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Dacre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Dacre. The network helps show where Nicholas Dacre may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Dacre, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Dacre Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Dacre links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202241
2 202431
3 202330
4 202420
5 201920
6 202317
7 202417
8 202111
9 202011
10 20219
11 20259
12 20218
13 20228
14 20217
15 20217
16 20237
17 20216
18 20206
19 20215
20 20215

About Nicholas Dacre

Nicholas Dacre is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Building and Construction, having authored 45 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Construction Project Management and Performance (10 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (8 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (6 papers), Management and Marketing Education (4 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (4 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (4 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (67 citations), Management Information Systems (69 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (71 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (83 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (27 citations). Nicholas Dacre has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hao Dong, PK Senyo, M.K.S. Al-Mhdawi, David Baxter, David Reynolds, Daniel Gozman, Farzad Pour Rahimian, Stan Karanasios, Abroon Qazi and Adrian R. Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as Information Systems Journal, Government Information Quarterly, Project Management Journal, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment and Production Planning & Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact