Ngo Cong‐Lem

640 citations
25 papers · 326 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ngo Cong‐Lem

22 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Ngo Cong‐Lem
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Health Informatics 30
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 26
  • Language and Linguistics 66
  • Computer Science Applications 27
  • Literature and Literary Theory 53
Replace Sarah W. Beck with:
Sarah W. Beck United States
Budi Waluyo Thailand
Raffaella Negretti Sweden
Sushil K. Oswal United States
E. Caroline Wylie United States
Mustafa Naci Kayaoğlu Türkiye
Ali Soyoof Macao
Sandra Schamroth Abrams United States
Aizan Yaacob Malaysia
Neal Lerner United States
Ngo Cong‐Lem relative to Sarah W. Beck United States Sarah W. Beck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sarah W. Beck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ngo Cong‐Lem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ngo Cong‐Lem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ngo Cong‐Lem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ngo Cong‐Lem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ngo Cong‐Lem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ngo Cong‐Lem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ngo Cong‐Lem. The network helps show where Ngo Cong‐Lem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Ngo Cong‐Lem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ngo Cong‐Lem Line = papers co-authored together Ngo Cong‐Lem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202150
2 202443
3 201840
4 202234
5 202426
6 202217
7 202215
8 202113
9 202411
10 202210
11 201910
12 20199
13 20249
14 20208
15 20246
16 20256
17 20255
18 20205
19 20184
20 20242

About Ngo Cong‐Lem

Ngo Cong‐Lem is a scholar working on Education, Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (8 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (6 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (5 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (4 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (30 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (26 citations), Language and Linguistics (66 citations), Computer Science Applications (27 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (53 citations). Ngo Cong‐Lem has collaborated with scholars based in Vietnam, Australia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Ali Soyoof, Tat Thang Nguyen, Minh Hue Nguyen, Lynette Pretorius, Sy-Ying Lee, Trịnh Thị Thủy, Thi Kim Anh Dang, Maureen Dobbins, Peter Bragge and Veronica Delafosse. Their work appears in journals such as International journal of doctoral studies, Disasters, Language Learning Journal, System and Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact