Newton E. Key
Impact in
Papers in
- History 9
- Historical Studies of British Isles 6
- Scottish History and National Identity 6
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 4
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 6
- Co-authors
- Jonathan Irvine Israel (1 shared paper)Jean‐Philippe Cointet (1 shared paper)Peter Bearman (1 shared paper)John P.B. Kenyon (1 shared paper)Jane H. Ohlmeyer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sixteenth Century Journal (2 papers)The English Historical Review (2 papers)The Journal of Military History (1 paper)Poetics (1 paper)Church History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
Newton E. Key
15 papers receiving 108 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- History 109
- Classics 28
- History and Philosophy of Science 30
- Religious studies 21
- General Social Sciences 11
Countries citing papers authored by Newton E. Key
This map shows the geographic impact of Newton E. Key's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Newton E. Key with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Newton E. Key more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Newton E. Key
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Newton E. Key. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Newton E. Key. The network helps show where Newton E. Key may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Newton E. Key, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 54 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 35 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 9 | Comprehension and the Breakdown of Consensus in Restoration Herefordshire | 1990 | 5 |
| 10 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 11 | Sources and debates in English history, 1485-1714 | 2004 | 2 |
| 12 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 15 | A review of "1688: The First Modern Revolution" by Steve Pincus | 2012 | 1 |
| 16 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 19 | ‘High feeding and Smart drinking’: Associating Hedge-Lane Lords in Exclusion Crisis London | 2006 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0 |
About Newton E. Key
Newton E. Key is a scholar working on History, Economics and Econometrics, General Social Sciences, Museology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies of British Isles (6 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (6 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (1 paper), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (1 paper) and Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (109 citations), Classics (28 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations), Religious studies (21 citations) and General Social Sciences (11 citations). Newton E. Key has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Irvine Israel, Jean‐Philippe Cointet, Peter Bearman, John P.B. Kenyon and Jane H. Ohlmeyer. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, The English Historical Review, The Journal of Military History, Poetics and Church History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.