Nele Libbrecht

10 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Nele Libbrecht
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Social Psychology 221
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 55
  • Clinical Psychology 103
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
  • Applied Psychology 12
Replace Jaime R. Durley with:
Jaime R. Durley United States
Isabel Carmona‐Cobo Spain
Stephanie Carrera United States
Ivana Macuka Croatia
Kathrine Bejanyan United Kingdom
Kellie St.Cyr Brisini United States
Manuel Fernández-Arata Peru
Amber Roberts United States
Andrew L. Thomson United States
Michelle Mendoza Lira Chile
Nele Libbrecht relative to Jaime R. Durley United States Jaime R. Durley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Jaime R. Durley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nele Libbrecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nele Libbrecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nele Libbrecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nele Libbrecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nele Libbrecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nele Libbrecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nele Libbrecht. The network helps show where Nele Libbrecht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Nele Libbrecht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nele Libbrecht Line = papers co-authored together Nele Libbrecht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2013108
2 201263
3 201253
4 201035
5 201518
6 201114
7 200812
8 20144
9 20082
10
Supervisor-subordinate relationship quality as a moderator in the relationship between procedural justice and feedback reactions in performance appraisal
20081

About Nele Libbrecht

Nele Libbrecht is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 10 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotional Intelligence and Performance (6 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (2 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (1 paper), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper) and Medical Education and Admissions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (221 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (55 citations), Clinical Psychology (103 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (50 citations) and Applied Psychology (12 citations). Nele Libbrecht has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Filip Lievens, Bernd Carette, Stéphane Côté, Thomas Rockstuhl, Alain De Beuckelaer, Eveline Schollaert, Carolyn MacCann, Ute‐Christine Klehe, Richard D. Roberts and Frederik Anseel. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition & Emotion, Applied Psychology, The Journal of Psychology, Educational and Psychological Measurement and International Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact