Neil Tuttle
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 9
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 7
- Co-authors
- E‐Liisa Laakso (9 shared papers)Rod Barrett (6 shared papers)Kerrie Evans (10 shared papers)Leanne Bisset (1 shared paper)Andrea Bialocerkowski (3 shared papers)Monique Waite (3 shared papers)Jennifer Sanderson (4 shared papers)Manuel Ferré (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Musculoskeletal Science and Practice (4 papers)Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (2 papers)Physiotherapy (2 papers)Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (2 papers)Ergonomics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Neil Tuttle
36 papers receiving 391 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Pharmacology 138
- Family Practice 8
- Occupational Therapy 12
- Rehabilitation 18
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 22
Countries citing papers authored by Neil Tuttle
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Tuttle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Tuttle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Tuttle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Tuttle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Tuttle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Tuttle. The network helps show where Neil Tuttle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil Tuttle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 58 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 8 | THE PITTING TEST; AN INVESTIGATION OF AN UNSTANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT OF LYMPHEDEMA. | 2015 | 22 |
| 9 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 5 |
About Neil Tuttle
Neil Tuttle is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Physiology and Oncology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (5 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers), Effects of Vibration on Health (3 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (138 citations), Family Practice (8 citations), Occupational Therapy (12 citations), Rehabilitation (18 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (22 citations). Neil Tuttle has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include E‐Liisa Laakso, Rod Barrett, Kerrie Evans, Leanne Bisset, Andrea Bialocerkowski, Monique Waite, Jennifer Sanderson, Manuel Ferré, Raúl Wirz and Ignacio Galiana. Their work appears in journals such as Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Physiotherapy, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy and Ergonomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.