Neil Simpson

1.1k citations
14 papers · 576 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Neil Simpson

13 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Neil Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Clinical Psychology 312
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 65
  • Speech and Hearing 46
  • Education 159
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 38
Replace Sophie Velleman with:
Sophie Velleman United Kingdom
Mary John United Kingdom
W. Michael Felts United States
Clare O’Callaghan Australia
Russell E. Hilliard United States
Richard Ssegonja Sweden
Rebecca Love United Kingdom
Lisa Terre United States
Anne C. Dobmeyer United States
Elahe Nezami United States
Neil Simpson relative to Sophie Velleman United Kingdom Sophie Velleman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Sophie Velleman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Simpson. The network helps show where Neil Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Neil Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Neil Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2014111
2
Complementary medicine use in children: extent and reasons. A population-based study.
200193
3 200683
4 200577
5 200762
6
How can adolescents' health needs and concerns best be met?
199738
7 200526
8 201524
9 199719
10 201219
11 201418
12 20043
13 20152
14 19861

About Neil Simpson

Neil Simpson is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Speech and Hearing, Pharmacy and Education, having authored 14 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Infant Health and Development (2 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper), Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (1 paper) and Herbal Medicine Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (312 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (65 citations), Speech and Hearing (46 citations), Education (159 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (38 citations). Neil Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Stallard, Kevin S. Roman, Rhiannon Phillips, Harry Daniels, Rob Anderson, Gordon Taylor, Elena Skryabina, Thomas H. Carter, Shane S. Bush and Sue Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal, Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Archives of Disease in Childhood and European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact