Neha Pathak

32 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Neha Pathak
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Health 96
  • Microbiology 29
  • Gender Studies 42
  • Epidemiology 145
  • Clinical Psychology 78
Replace Yanxiao Gao with:
Yanxiao Gao China
P Otterblad Olausson Sweden
Lavinia Lin United States
Jiuling Wu China
José Manuel Peixoto Caldas Portugal
Beth A. Brown United States
Rajeev Seth United States
Ditte Søndergaard Linde Denmark
Arlete Fernandes Brazil
Claudine Burton‐Jeangros Switzerland
Neha Pathak relative to Yanxiao Gao China Yanxiao Gao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Yanxiao Gao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neha Pathak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neha Pathak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neha Pathak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neha Pathak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neha Pathak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neha Pathak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neha Pathak. The network helps show where Neha Pathak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neha Pathak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neha Pathak Line = papers co-authored together Neha Pathak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014144
2 201868
3 201634
4 202227
5 202215
6
Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic groups in England are at increased risk of death from COVID-19: indirect standardisation of NHS mortality data [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
202014
7 201613
8 201710
9 20229
10 20178
11 20228
12 20175
13 20214
14 20163
15 20153
16 20183
17 20193
18 20233
19 20242
20 20252

About Neha Pathak

Neha Pathak is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, General Health Professions, Oncology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (7 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Sex work and related issues (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (96 citations), Microbiology (29 citations), Gender Studies (42 citations), Epidemiology (145 citations) and Clinical Psychology (78 citations). Neha Pathak has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Khalid S. Khan, Javier Zamora, Julie Dodds, Shema Tariq, Rageshri Dhairyawan, Anwar R. Tappuni, Robert W Aldridge, Gene Feder, Rohini Mathur and Junqing Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Sexually Transmitted Infections, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, Modern Rheumatology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and The Lancet Regional Health - Europe.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact