Neha Pathak

1.3k citations
42 papers · 423 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • Health top 10%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
    • Hepatitis B Virus Studies

Papers in

Neha Pathak

35 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers

Neha Pathak
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Health 82
  • Epidemiology 136
  • Gender Studies 29
  • Clinical Psychology 58
  • Demography 34
Replace Chantal Tapé with:
Chantal Tapé United States
Anadil Alam Bangladesh
Lavinia Lin United States
Jana Hesser United States
Azam Rahmani Iran
Steven C. Matson United States
Rosanna F. Hess United States
Ahideé Leyva-López Mexico
Fatimat Motunrayo Akinlusi Nigeria
Susan Carr Australia
Neha Pathak relative to Chantal Tapé United States Chantal Tapé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Chantal Tapé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neha Pathak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neha Pathak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neha Pathak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neha Pathak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neha Pathak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neha Pathak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neha Pathak. The network helps show where Neha Pathak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neha Pathak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neha Pathak Line = papers co-authored together Neha Pathak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014147
2 201874
3 201635
4 202227
5 202220
6
Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic groups in England are at increased risk of death from COVID-19: indirect standardisation of NHS mortality data [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
202014
7 201614
8 201710
9 202210
10 20178
11 20228
12 20175
13 20214
14 20234
15 20164
16 20154
17 20223
18 20183
19 20193
20 20232

About Neha Pathak

Neha Pathak is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (7 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (2 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (82 citations), Epidemiology (136 citations), Gender Studies (29 citations), Clinical Psychology (58 citations) and Demography (34 citations). Neha Pathak has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Khalid S. Khan, Javier Zamora, Julie Dodds, Shema Tariq, Rageshri Dhairyawan, Anwar R. Tappuni, Gene Feder, Robert W Aldridge, Rohini Mathur and Ersheng Gao. Their work appears in journals such as Sexually Transmitted Infections, Clinical Medicine, Modern Rheumatology, Maturitas and Psychology of Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact